From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Schwebel Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 19:53:42 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] PATCH : Fixes and enhancements for NAND flash. In-Reply-To: <20030727173733.835F4C602D@atlas.denx.de> References: <20030727173733.835F4C602D@atlas.denx.de> Message-ID: <20030727175341.GI28983@pengutronix.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 07:37:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message you wrote: > > Yes placement could be improved. However, it is done on a per block basis, > > not byte, so the overhead isn't that noticeable. Spinning a wheel every 16k > > should not be that bad. (Its currently spinning at the page size instead of > > the block, but that could be easily changed). > > My $ 0.02: forget about it. It's not worth any effort. Shouldn't unix design philosophy be "if there is a user who needs it don't forbid it per design but make it configurable per policy"...? Robert -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Hornemannstra?e 12, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4