From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:07:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from p508B60E0.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.96.224]:43923 "EHLO dea.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:07:55 +0100 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6UE7mx6026551; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:07:48 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6UE7mYC026550; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:07:48 +0200 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:07:48 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Keith M Wesolowski , "Kevin D. Kissell" , Linux/MIPS Development Subject: Re: CVS Update@-mips.org: linux Message-ID: <20030730140748.GC26372@linux-mips.org> References: <20030730021249.GC7366@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 2932 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:47:34AM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > > It will flash up on your retina and stay there for a while, waiting > > > > for your response, if you run `make oldconfig' :-) > > > > > > Hmm, now I have to speed up my transition to 2.6 to have my curiosity > > > appeased... Hopefully I won't get disappointed. > > > > Well, 2.6 won't be the big leap that 2.4 was for most MIPS users, more > > evolution than revolution ... > > I'm referring to that menus that will flash up on my retina (if I got the > meaning right). ;-) Oh :-) > Anyway, it looks like some additional checks and possibly fixes will be > needed for 64-bit configurations (including changes to my pending > patches). And last time I checked 2.5.x had showstopper problems for me > elsewhere (IDE -- I still use it here and there) -- I doubt they have been > fixed in the recent 2.6 -test releases. True, 2.6 isn't yet a great stability experience ... Ralf