From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271197AbTHHDBZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:01:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271200AbTHHDBZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:01:25 -0400 Received: from mayhem.byteworld.com ([63.127.169.21]:57244 "EHLO chaos.byteworld.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271197AbTHHDBY (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:01:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:01:33 -0400 From: William Enck To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [bk patches] 2.6.x net driver updates Message-ID: <20030808030133.GA20401@chaos.byteworld.com> References: <20030808000508.GA4464@gtf.org> <20030808013649.GA20003@chaos.byteworld.com> <3F32FFAD.1050203@pobox.com> <20030808020416.GA20116@chaos.byteworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030808020416.GA20116@chaos.byteworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Sent-From: chaos.byteworld.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:04:16PM -0400, William Enck wrote: > The first set i was from -test2-bk7 and the second was from your patch. > Your patch didn't cause the problem. I replied to your email because you > had updates to orinoco_cs.c and I thought there was a chance your patch > was supposed to fix it. I guess a reply was not the best thing to do, > shall I start a new thread? This looks like it is a totaly separate problem. I tested -mm5 and it didn't work in there either. I'm going to start a new thread for this. Will -- William Enck wenck@wapu.org