From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ryan Underwood <nemesis-lists@icequake.net>
Subject: Re: dosemu 1.1.5.7 (was Re: dosemu 1.1.5.6)
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 17:36:30 -0500
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20030823223630.GP6464@dbz.icequake.net>
References: <20030823215903.GO6464@dbz.icequake.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308232306560.4390-100000@enm-bo-lt.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308232306560.4390-100000@enm-bo-lt.localdomain>
List-Id: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org


Hi Bart,

On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 11:17:14PM +0100, Bart Oldeman wrote:
> >
> > Well, that particular patch looks like it is for the debian-installer
> > package which is not related to DOSEMU.  However, I can use the same
> > trick in my build script.  I'm mainly curious why this only started
> > happening in 1.1.5.7 -- I built 1.1.5.6 and previous with no
> > modifications or extra pain needed.
> 
> well the trick avoids using $(shell ... pwd) in Makefiles for each
> recursive invocation of "make". $(shell) is fairly expensive; by reducing
> the number of it to exactly one (instead of ~100 in 1.1.5.6) it was
> possible to reduce the time to "make" a (nearly) built tree
> significantly, on one PC by about 10 seconds from 15 to less than 5; and
> Clarence Dang has seen even greater differences.
> 
> For a user who compiles her/himself this doesn't matter that much but for
> a developer who often makes a small change and then recompiles it saves a
> lot of waiting.

Sounds reasonable to me, I've worked around it in my build script.

See ya,

-- 
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>, icq=10317253