From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:35:18 +0900 (JST) Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20031007.203518.82055464.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20031007034051.3fcb3218.davem@redhat.com> <200310071116.PAA30760@yakov.inr.ac.ru> <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, mashirle@us.ibm.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: To: davem@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@redhat.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org In article <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@redhat.com> (at Tue, 7 Oct 2003 04:12:46 -0700), "David S. Miller" says: > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:16:20 +0400 (MSD) > kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > > > Actually, this does not depend on our implementation. If people implement > > a MIB, required precision of these times is prescribed in the rfc. > > And this is definitely not jiffies. > > Right, Shirley what is it? The type is TimeTicks (RFC2578) via TimeStamp (RFC2579). Thus, uint32_t counter in 1/100 sec. unit. --yoshfuji