rusty you may want to review your rules before this gets in ;)

the "Trivial Patch Monkey" is neither documented in MAINTAINERS
nor was there a note in SubmittingPatches, i hope this helps
further recognition and easier catch

so let the monkey apply himself in re-transmission mode!

please apply
ma(ks|x(imilian)?)

--- linux-2.6.0-test7/Documentation/SubmittingPatches	2003-10-08 21:24:00.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches	2003-10-09 12:41:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -132,6 +132,21 @@
 Even if the maintainer did not respond in step #4, make sure to ALWAYS
 copy the maintainer when you change their code.
 
+For small patches you may want to CC Trivial Patch Monkey 
+trivial@rustcorp.com.au set up by Rusty Russel which collects "trivial" 
+patches. Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules:
+ Spelling fixes in documentation
+ Spelling fixes which could break grep(1).
+ Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad)
+ Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct)
+ Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things)
+ Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region).
+ Contact detail and documentation fixes
+ Non-portable code replaced by portable code (even in arch-specific, 
+ since people copy, as long as it's trivial)
+ Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file. (ie. patch monkey 
+ in re-transmission mode)
+
 
 
 6) No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments.  Just plain text.