From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] (resend) fix sock_raw behaviour Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 23:53:38 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20031009235338.7335b635.davem@redhat.com> References: <20031008235150.A207@jeroen.pe1rxq.ampr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Jeroen Vreeken In-Reply-To: <20031008235150.A207@jeroen.pe1rxq.ampr.org> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:51:50 +0200 Jeroen Vreeken wrote: > This is a resend of a patch from some weeks ago that doesn't appear to have > made it in yet... It doesn't apply, that's why. You patch ax25.h twice the same exact way which causes the patch to not apply. While we're talking about this, who is going to maintain AX25 in 2.6.x? I don't want to be taking bug fixes and other changes to AX25 from random people, I'd like to have a single contact that will review the AX25 patches from other people and then forward them off to me.