From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree Subject: Re: raid1 critical sections not protected in 2.4.x? Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 09:13:55 +0200 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031014071355.GC1951@marowsky-bree.de> References: <1065721318.4761.138.camel@persist.az.mvista.com> <20031010081445.GC29059@marowsky-bree.de> <1066080570.4761.233.camel@persist.az.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1066080570.4761.233.camel@persist.az.mvista.com> To: Steven Dake Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 2003-10-13T14:29:30, Steven Dake said: > Could you provide a pointer to those md locking fixes? I'm on a train right now :), but I believe I put a copy of the most recent version at ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/lmb/md/md-locking. If not, I'll put them there as soon as possible ;-) Neil is currently travelling too, so he hadn't had time to review it yet. My version deviates from his to fix some races which we found. There's some more work I think needs doing, namely moving all of the md global structs and arrays into a single struct md_whatever[] for tidyness, but I'm not sure whether I still want to touch the 2.4 code a= t all ;-) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e --=20 High Availability & Clustering ever tried. ever failed. no matter. SuSE Labs try again. fail again. fail better. Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG -- Samuel Beckett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html