From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262345AbTJNMVV (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:21:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262353AbTJNMVV (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:21:21 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:58072 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262345AbTJNMVU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:21:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:17:54 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Andrew Morton Cc: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mem=16MB laptop testing Message-ID: <20031014121753.GA610@krispykreme> References: <20031014105514.GH765@holomorphy.com> <20031014045614.22ea9c4b.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031014045614.22ea9c4b.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > hrm. min_free_kbytes is normally 1024. I'm surprised that the additional > 900k made so much difference. We must be on the hairy edge. > > It looks like we need to precalculate/scale min_free_kbytes, yes? That would be good for both the low and high end. Id like to see it default to something larger on my 16GB+ machines. Anton