From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from colo.lackof.org (colo.lackof.org [198.49.126.79]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5F848AC for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:52:45 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:52:42 -0600 From: Grant Grundler To: Joel Soete Cc: Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, Derek Engelhaupt Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] L2000/N4000 smp devices/boot compare?? Message-ID: <20031015045242.GB7351@colo.lackof.org> References: <20031003114959.GM24824@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <3F8A272E0000157A@ocpmta3.freegates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3F8A272E0000157A@ocpmta3.freegates.net> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:59:52PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote: > If I well understand it means that a same real (absolute) address > has a different virtual addresse for each processor? multiple translations. It can be across processors but doesn't have to be. > (btw Do you have any idea where i can find of the detail way to implement > it?) If someone had worked it out and provided a patch, we probably be using it. I think that's what you (or someone) needs to do. sorry, grant