From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documentation
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:31:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031016103117.091B6C59E4@atlas.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:56:13 +0200." <20031016095613.GJ25427@pengutronix.de>
Dear Robert,
in message <20031016095613.GJ25427@pengutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> I know that this is not an easy decision for you and I've already
> accepted that we have to live with our own -ptx patches for some time;
> long term I would embrace if you could decide to have a clear separation
> between a stable and unstable branch.
I spend a lot of time working with different branches of some source
tree, so this is something I will try to avoid for U-Boot. There are
clearly marked stable versions (x.y.0), and there are "unstable" or
"development" versions. This is what we have now, and what I intend
to stay with for the foreseeable future.
U-Boot is not such a big project with many independ groups of
developers working on different areas. Even bigger contributions like
support for a new hardware architecture are usually pretty orthogonal
to existing code - or can be made so.
I do not see the need for an "unstable branch". On contrary, I am
convinced that a second branch in the public source tree would only
increase the necessary maintenance efford.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
I program, therefore I am.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-16 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-17 14:35 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documented behaviour Anders Larsen
2003-09-18 11:00 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Wolfgang Denk
2003-09-18 12:15 ` Anders Larsen
2003-09-18 21:20 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-10-13 16:10 ` [U-Boot-Users] Re: [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documentation Anders Larsen
2003-10-13 16:16 ` Robert Schwebel
2003-10-13 16:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-10-14 7:55 ` Anders Larsen
2003-10-14 20:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-10-16 9:56 ` Robert Schwebel
2003-10-16 10:31 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2003-10-16 10:50 ` Robert Schwebel
2003-10-16 11:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-10-27 15:05 ` [U-Boot-Users] Re: [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documented behaviour Steven Scholz
2003-10-27 16:02 ` [U-Boot-Users] Re: [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documentation Anders Larsen
2003-12-06 16:08 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documented behaviour Wolfgang Denk
2003-12-07 8:37 ` Robert Schwebel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031016103117.091B6C59E4@atlas.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.