From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261936AbTJXBwT (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:52:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261938AbTJXBwT (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:52:19 -0400 Received: from hockin.org ([66.35.79.110]:17670 "EHLO www.hockin.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261936AbTJXBwS (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:52:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:42:09 -0700 From: Tim Hockin To: Ian Kent Cc: Mike Waychison , Ingo Oeser , Kernel Mailing List , torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [NFS] RE: [autofs] multiple servers per automount Message-ID: <20031024014209.GA23734@hockin.org> References: <3F980949.1040201@sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Recap: Mike Waychison posted a simple patch to make Max_anon bit array (NFS mounts etc.) use exactly one page. On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 08:47:57AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > I there any chance this would be accepted into 2.6.0? > > I think it's quite important, hopefully others do as well. Wouldn't it be saner to have a sysctl to adjust that? From 1 page to 2^20/(PAGE_SIZE * CHAR_BIT) pages? Perhaps just in page-sized increments? This would be a simple patch... But maybe it's not 'stabilization' for 2.6.0. Maybe the simple version in 2.6.0 and the right version in 2.6.1? Linus?