From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test9-bk27-netdrvr-exp1 - r8169 update Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:34:59 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20031124223459.A11435@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20031122183001.GA16993@gtf.org> <20031124000939.A456@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <3FC14058.4010600@mcve.com> <20031124004023.A1140@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <3FC14AA3.9050009@mcve.com> <20031124090421.A4482@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <3FC21843.2080805@mcve.com> <20031124184908.A9566@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <3FC24C2B.1030007@mainstreetsoftworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Brad House Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FC24C2B.1030007@mainstreetsoftworks.com>; from brad@mainstreetsoftworks.com on Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 01:21:31PM -0500 Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Brad House : > Yes, I can do that. These are the patches I applied: > -ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/patchkits/2.6/2.6.0-test9-bk25-netdrvr-exp1.patch.bz2 > -r8169-mac-phy-version.patch [...] > Let me know where to begin, and I'll do it. You patch -R in the following order until you get the behavior of vanilla kernel (or return to vanilla and patch in reverse order but you will notice a small reject for rx_copybreak due to an inserted GPL_MODULE in -netdrvr-exp). - r8169-mac-phy-version.patch - r8169-rx_copybreak.patch (11/22/2003 in euroland) - r8169-dma-api-tx-buffers.patch - r8169-start-xmit-fixes.patch - r8169-dma-api-data-buffers.patch - r8169-dma-api-tx.patch 1 - If you don't get the usual behavior at this point, something is _wrong_. 2 - You will have a one line offset, don't worry. Thank you. -- Ueimor