From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AY5vN-0000Cq-Pm for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:55:21 -0800 Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.35]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AY5vN-0004c9-8E for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 07:55:21 -0800 From: BlaisorBlade Subject: Re: [uml-devel] 2.4.22-[67] problems References: <20031220011323.GW18100@alcor.net> <20031220171450.GB10692@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20031221004742.GE9354@alcor.net> In-Reply-To: <20031221004742.GE9354@alcor.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312211658.44353.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:58:44 +0100 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Alle 01:47, domenica 21 dicembre 2003, Matt Zimmerman ha scritto: > Thanks for looking at it. It's sounding more and more like the new > glibc/linux-kernel-headers packages have broken UML. > Maybe something is > getting the host's kernel headers when it needs the ones from the UML build > tree? Something is getting the host's headers and it must get them, not the ones from UML build tree. Every UML arch file with its name ending in _user.c(+ quite a lot of other ones, listed in USER_OBJS in Makefiles) are built against the host headers, since they are the code interacting with the host. But you need to actually compile UML against 2.4 host headers to see if this is the reason; debugging it can be worst than an unnoticed wrong pointer or buffer overrun, since probably a macro went in silently and it changed the semantics of sources... -- cat <