From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265114AbTLWMG3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 07:06:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265115AbTLWMG3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 07:06:29 -0500 Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr ([213.228.0.44]:7649 "EHLO postfix3-1.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265114AbTLWMG1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 07:06:27 -0500 From: Duncan Sands To: "Bradley W. Allen" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:06:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: ulmo@q.net References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312231306.24106.baldrick@free.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 23 December 2003 12:51, Bradley W. Allen wrote: > DevFS was written by an articulate person who solved a lot of > problems. udev sounds more like a thug who's smug about winning, > not explaining himself, saying things like "oh, the other guy > disappeared, so who cares, you have to use my code, too bad it sucks". I've heard that around here it's the code that does the talking... :) Ciao, Duncan.