From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karol Kozimor Subject: Re: ACPI and framebuffer related problems with Linux 2.6.1-rc1 Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:32:21 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20040102113221.GA13322@hell.org.pl> References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C6E@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C6E-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Yu, Luming" Cc: Martin Loschwitz , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thus wrote Yu, Luming: > >However, there is a problem with ACPI: > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/performance, > >which was there in previous versions of the kernel and allowed me to > slow the > >CPU down in order to save power, disappeared in Linux 2.6.1-rc1. It's > simply > >not there anymore. Was it replaced? > > It sounds like a regression. Would you file it on > http://bugzilla.kernel.org I guess he needs rather to compile the ACPI performance CPUFreq driver and insmod acpi.ko, or something similar. That's a pretty non-obvious change over 2.4. Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265511AbUABLcW (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 06:32:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265514AbUABLcW (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 06:32:22 -0500 Received: from hell.org.pl ([212.244.218.42]:5391 "HELO hell.org.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265511AbUABLcU (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 06:32:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:32:21 +0100 From: Karol Kozimor To: "Yu, Luming" Cc: Martin Loschwitz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [ACPI] ACPI and framebuffer related problems with Linux 2.6.1-rc1 Message-ID: <20040102113221.GA13322@hell.org.pl> Mail-Followup-To: "Yu, Luming" , Martin Loschwitz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C6E@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C6E@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thus wrote Yu, Luming: > >However, there is a problem with ACPI: > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/performance, > >which was there in previous versions of the kernel and allowed me to > slow the > >CPU down in order to save power, disappeared in Linux 2.6.1-rc1. It's > simply > >not there anymore. Was it replaced? > > It sounds like a regression. Would you file it on > http://bugzilla.kernel.org I guess he needs rather to compile the ACPI performance CPUFreq driver and insmod acpi.ko, or something similar. That's a pretty non-obvious change over 2.4. Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan@hell.org.pl