All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@hell.org.pl>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.0-mm2] PM timer still has problems
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:54:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040105225400.GA5495@hell.org.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1073341969.15645.106.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>

Thus wrote john stultz:
> > > If the override boot option failed, its most likely your system doesn't
> > > have an ACPI PM time source.  Instead it seems your system is having
> > Well, I don't have the slightest idea on how to determine this, though I
> > read somewhere that all ACPI-compliant systems have those.
> More debug output is probably needed. 

I'll be happy to provide it :)

> > > trouble using the PIT as a time source (which seems not all that
> > > uncommon unfortunately). 
> > Perhaps, though bear in mind it behaves so only if clock=pmtmr has been
> > appended and works fine with clock=pit.
> Ah, I must have missed that point. Indeed that is very odd. When booting
> without the clock= what time source is used? Does booting w/
> "clock=crazy" also show the problem?

It depends -- generally either PIT (that's 2.4) or TSC, the latter switches
back to PIT once CPUFreq is used. I've never seen any problems with the
bogomips loop or /proc/cpuinfo, except when it could be directly attributed
to CPUFreq bugs.

I booted the following with clock=crazy:
1) 2.6.1-rc1-mm1 with Dmitry's patch: deadlock as before
2) 2.6.0-test11-almost vanilla (Nigel's swsusp patches): passed, results
   similar to -rc1-mm1 vanilla, i.e. cpuinfo shows 0 MHz and bogomips is
   miscalculated.

So it seems to be a more generic problem.
2.6.1-rc1 is on the way.

Best regards,

-- 
Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor
sziwan@hell.org.pl

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-05 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-30 20:48 [2.6.0-mm2] PM timer still has problems Karol Kozimor
2003-12-31  4:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04  0:44   ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-05  6:17     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-01-05 12:18       ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-06  8:31       ` john stultz
2004-01-07  6:30         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-01-07 17:01           ` john stultz
2004-03-29 15:44       ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-05 22:11 ` john stultz
2004-01-05 22:17   ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-05 22:32     ` john stultz
2004-01-05 22:54       ` Karol Kozimor [this message]
2004-01-05 23:18       ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-05 23:30         ` john stultz
2004-01-06  4:32   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-01-17  1:54     ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-24  0:55     ` Karol Kozimor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040105225400.GA5495@hell.org.pl \
    --to=sziwan@hell.org.pl \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.