From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from baldric (baldric.uwo.ca [129.100.10.225]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE1D48A8 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:47:44 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:39:25 -0500 From: Carlos O'Donell To: John David Anglin Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] [Status] hppa's userspace in 2004 (looking back) Message-ID: <20040106053924.GC14464@systemhalted> References: <20040105172146.GE23782@systemhalted> <200401051848.i05Imt6p005065@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200401051848.i05Imt6p005065@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:48:54PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > As usual, I expect there will be many ups and downs in the process. > So, we won't get as far as we would like. > > > jda, you mentioned that the libstdc++ testsuite could be examined in > > order to fix some of our failures. > > Yes, these need to be looked at before 3.4 is released. Some appear > to be related to long double support. Just guessing, but I think the > rest are locale or glibc related. Does this seem like a reasonable triage list? a. gdb. b. atomic kernel ops. c. libstdc++ failures. c.