From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos O'Donell Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] [Status] hppa's userspace in 2004 (looking back) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:48:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20040106154859.GA18590__33132.1675949313$1416623109$gmane$org@systemhalted> References: <20040106053924.GC14464@systemhalted> <200401060616.i066GiBR007413@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org To: John David Anglin Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <200401060616.i066GiBR007413@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:16:44AM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > > Does this seem like a reasonable triage list? > > > > a. gdb. > > b. atomic kernel ops. > > c. libstdc++ failures. > > I expect GCC 3.4 is coming in 2-3 months, although there isn't a definite > timeline yet. Would you like to try to get atomic kernel ops in 2.6.x? > How important is the kernel timeline for this work? We missed gdb 6.0. > A couple of quick hacks allow 6.0 to build for hppa-linux. Bug fixes are > another matter. No timeline, just icing. > Probably, the v3 issues involve doing enough research to file a PR if > the problem is generic, fix the problem if it is GCC hppa specific. > If a problem turns out to be glibc/kernel related, we can wait for > a fix ;) I can interleave b,c in order to help you out? :) 80% gdb. 10% atomic ops. 10% libstc++ failures. c.