From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harald Welte Subject: Re: [RFC] IPv4 Netfilter hook priorities for SELinux Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:13:11 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040106191311.GH934@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U3s59FfKcByyGl+j" Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, "David S. Miller" , Stephen Smalley Return-path: To: James Morris Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --U3s59FfKcByyGl+j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:01:03AM -0500, James Morris wrote: =20 > Does anyone have any objections to the patch below (which I'd propose for= =20 > 2.6.2), or other comments? Thanks James, I am perfectly fine with your patch. Feel free to put them into netfilter_arp.h and netfilter_ipv6.h, too. > - James --=20 - Harald Welte http://www.netfilter.org/ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie --U3s59FfKcByyGl+j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/+wjGXaXGVTD0i/8RAjFRAJ9Mub15xR+99zCM+eZgCi04/P3XCACeLCmI B9EEK83mrXSiQN6i549VcP4= =vGvz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --U3s59FfKcByyGl+j--