From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261563AbUANPKV (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:10:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261784AbUANPKV (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:10:21 -0500 Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de ([81.169.145.165]:5579 "EHLO natsmtp00.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261563AbUANPKQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:10:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:08:06 +0100 From: Dominik Brodowski To: paul.devriendt@amd.com Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, davej@redhat.com, mark.langsdorf@amd.com, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Cleanups for powernow-k8 Message-ID: <20040114150806.GA5137@dominikbrodowski.de> Mail-Followup-To: paul.devriendt@amd.com, pavel@ucw.cz, davej@redhat.com, mark.langsdorf@amd.com, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C080EF3A4@txexmtae.amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C080EF3A4@txexmtae.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:49:18AM -0600, paul.devriendt@amd.com wrote: > Absolutely. I am planning on using them also in the new ACPI based driver, > along with your acpi-perflib. Excellent. > What is your progress on getting acpi-perflib merged into the kernel so t= hat > an additional patch is not needed ? Unfortunately, it seems to be too invasive in the form it was proposed at first. However, I'm currently in the process of getting the same infrastructure[*] in place by doing small, logical, incremental changes to drivers/acpi/processor.c. The first three patches are submitted to Len Brown [1][2][3]; I haven't received a reply from him about these patches yet. What helps in developing this is that I finally own a notebook which supports ACPI P-States.... Dominik [*] or almost the same infrastructure. The first two core patches assure=20 that _PPC and passive cooling work. [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dacpi4linux&m=3D107398569012495&w=3D2 [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dacpi4linux&m=3D107398568612489&w=3D2 [3] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dacpi4linux&m=3D107407671712989&w=3D2 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFABVtWZ8MDCHJbN8YRAkM/AJ47tbig09FYxsmGPJeGoZNaZP0zCACfUH6l kSr94kLj65/nm9+YA3dIzDY= =4Wls -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: Cleanups for powernow-k8 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:08:06 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040114150806.GA5137@dominikbrodowski.de> References: <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C080EF3A4@txexmtae.amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============70023051996840779==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C080EF3A4@txexmtae.amd.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk To: paul.devriendt@amd.com Cc: davej@redhat.com, mark.langsdorf@amd.com, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --===============70023051996840779== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:49:18AM -0600, paul.devriendt@amd.com wrote: > Absolutely. I am planning on using them also in the new ACPI based driver, > along with your acpi-perflib. Excellent. > What is your progress on getting acpi-perflib merged into the kernel so t= hat > an additional patch is not needed ? Unfortunately, it seems to be too invasive in the form it was proposed at first. However, I'm currently in the process of getting the same infrastructure[*] in place by doing small, logical, incremental changes to drivers/acpi/processor.c. The first three patches are submitted to Len Brown [1][2][3]; I haven't received a reply from him about these patches yet. What helps in developing this is that I finally own a notebook which supports ACPI P-States.... Dominik [*] or almost the same infrastructure. The first two core patches assure=20 that _PPC and passive cooling work. [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dacpi4linux&m=3D107398569012495&w=3D2 [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dacpi4linux&m=3D107398568612489&w=3D2 [3] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dacpi4linux&m=3D107407671712989&w=3D2 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFABVtWZ8MDCHJbN8YRAkM/AJ47tbig09FYxsmGPJeGoZNaZP0zCACfUH6l kSr94kLj65/nm9+YA3dIzDY= =4Wls -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- --===============70023051996840779== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cpufreq mailing list Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq --===============70023051996840779==--