From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261262AbUANPWP (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:22:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266322AbUANPWP (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:22:15 -0500 Received: from delerium.codemonkey.org.uk ([81.187.208.145]:58752 "EHLO delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261262AbUANPWO (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:22:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:21:53 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: paul.devriendt@amd.com, pavel@ucw.cz, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Cleanups for powernow-k8 Message-ID: <20040114152152.GB5496@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , paul.devriendt@amd.com, pavel@ucw.cz, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C080EF392@txexmtae.amd.com> <20040113230605.GM14674@redhat.com> <20040114101041.GB16737@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040114101041.GB16737@dominikbrodowski.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:10:41AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:06:05PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote: > > Part of the justification for cpufreq (at least on x86) was an alternative > > for when ACPI just doesn't work, or for when folks either don't want to, > > or can't run ACPI (through various other AML bugs for eg). > > Except that the ACPI P-States implementation also uses the cpufreq > infrastructure. Sure, but that came later.. Dave