From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH] various IDE patches/cleanups Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:41:09 +0100 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200402032041.09696.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> References: <20040103152802.6e27f5c5.davmac@ozonline.com.au> <200401061213.39843.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <20040130142725.1a408f9e.davmac@ozonline.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:53247 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266139AbUBCThB (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:37:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20040130142725.1a408f9e.davmac@ozonline.com.au> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Davin McCall Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Friday 30 of January 2004 04:27, you wrote: > I've been doing some hacking on the IDE layer, just to fix a few issues I > noticed going through the code. Due to the complex nature of the code I'm > bound to have missed some things and perhaps misunderstood others. > Nevertheless I'm posting these patches in the hope that they can be tested > on other machines, rejected, or even accepted. > > Comments and criticisms are welcome. Thanks! I'm slowly reading through them (yeah, code is really complex). Patch 3rd and 5th seems okay, 2nd and 4th need some more checking/thinking. > The first patch, below, is already included in the -mm tree. The further > patches are appearing here for the first time. It was pushed to Linus and merged. --bart