From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: coding style question Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:25:23 +0000 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040225182523.GD25779@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:28605 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261512AbUBYSZ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:25:29 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jay Denebeim Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 06:16:48PM +0000, Jay Denebeim wrote: > I've noticed that in 2.6 many of the constructs like: > > typedef struct foo { blah } > > have been changed to > > struct foo { blah } > > what was the reasoning for this? We hate typedefs. -- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain