From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, vojtech@suse.cz
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
PARISC list <parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the cpumask rewrite
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:11:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040701131158.GP698@openzaurus.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406260948070.14449@ppc970.osdl.org>
Hi!
> And the same is true of "volatile" for the bitop functions. They are
> volatile not because they require the data to be volatile, but because
> they have at least traditionally been used for various cases, _including_
> volatile.
>
> Now, we could say that we don't do that any more, and decide that the
> regular bitop functions really cannot be used on volatile stuff. But
> that's a BIG decision. And it's certainly not a decision that parisc
> users should make.
Heh, with vojtech we introduced locking into input layer
(there was none before)... using test_bit/set_bit.
(I just hope set_bit etc implies memory barrier... or we'll have to do
it once more)
Pavel
--
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-01 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-26 16:08 [PATCH] Fix the cpumask rewrite James Bottomley
2004-06-26 16:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 16:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 16:46 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-26 16:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 17:18 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-26 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 18:28 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-06-26 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 19:02 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-26 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 19:13 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-06-26 18:59 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-26 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 19:33 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-28 23:16 ` Jonathan Lundell
2004-07-01 13:11 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-07-01 14:07 ` [parisc-linux] " Alan Cox
2004-07-01 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-01 16:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-07-01 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 22:18 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-26 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 22:54 ` [parisc-linux] " Alan Cox
2004-06-27 0:05 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-27 12:00 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-27 22:41 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-28 1:24 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-28 5:42 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-28 6:55 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-28 7:02 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-28 7:19 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-27 14:37 ` Alan Cox
2004-07-01 13:33 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-01 17:43 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-26 23:37 ` jiffies_64 Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-27 1:55 ` more (insane) jiffies ranting Chris Wedgwood
2004-06-27 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-27 17:39 ` [parisc-linux] " Linus Torvalds
2004-06-27 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-26 16:32 ` [PATCH] Fix the cpumask rewrite Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040701131158.GP698@openzaurus.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.