From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267497AbUJGRlW (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:41:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267515AbUJGRJ7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:09:59 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:39599 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267516AbUJGQwW (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:52:22 -0400 From: Jesse Barnes To: Patrick Gefre Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:52:02 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: Grant Grundler , Colin Ngam , "Luck, Tony" , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org References: <200410061344.38265.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <41655A91.1010307@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <41655A91.1010307@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410070952.02291.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, October 7, 2004 8:02 am, Patrick Gefre wrote: > > They should each be separate cleanup patches. What I've done in the past > > is make copies (in this case 5) of the big patch. Then I edit all of > > them to include only the hunks I want there. Hopefully that'll minimize > > the pain of respinning the big patch (i.e. no respin). Also, Tony > > doesn't want to deal with the above files, patches for them should be > > sent to Andrew as separate mails with lkml in the cc list. > > These are not cleanup. > > The mmtimer code and sn_console include a file that doesn't exist anymore > in the directory included - it's moved to somewhere else in the 002 patch. > > snsc.c, sgiioc4.c have changes for things that won't exist after this patch > is applied. Yeah, sorry, I shouldn't have said cleanup, fixup is better. Anyway, they need to be separate since they'll be going into the tree via Andrew not Tony. Thanks, Jesse From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:52:02 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization Message-Id: <200410070952.02291.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> List-Id: References: <200410061344.38265.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <41655A91.1010307@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <41655A91.1010307@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Patrick Gefre Cc: Grant Grundler , Colin Ngam , "Luck, Tony" , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, October 7, 2004 8:02 am, Patrick Gefre wrote: > > They should each be separate cleanup patches. What I've done in the past > > is make copies (in this case 5) of the big patch. Then I edit all of > > them to include only the hunks I want there. Hopefully that'll minimize > > the pain of respinning the big patch (i.e. no respin). Also, Tony > > doesn't want to deal with the above files, patches for them should be > > sent to Andrew as separate mails with lkml in the cc list. > > These are not cleanup. > > The mmtimer code and sn_console include a file that doesn't exist anymore > in the directory included - it's moved to somewhere else in the 002 patch. > > snsc.c, sgiioc4.c have changes for things that won't exist after this patch > is applied. Yeah, sorry, I shouldn't have said cleanup, fixup is better. Anyway, they need to be separate since they'll be going into the tree via Andrew not Tony. Thanks, Jesse