From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: what to do with dpt_i2o Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 17:01:14 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20041009150114.GA21229@lst.de> References: <20040925134622.GA19871@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:39572 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266885AbUJIPBW (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2004 11:01:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040925134622.GA19871@lst.de> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mark_Salyzyn@adaptec.com, markus.lidel@shadowconnect.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 03:46:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Marcus, you'd been doing a lot of testing with the DPT/Adaptec cards for > the new i2o layer, right? IIRC we now have both support for the Adaptec > managment utils and the optimizes sglist format, so there's probably no > reason anymore to keep dpt_i2o. > > If OTOH we want to keep it it would be nice of Mark could finally send > the last round of patches we had agreed on.. ping..