From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francesco Biscani Subject: Re: Vanilla kernel patch Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:32:23 +0200 Message-ID: <200410111132.29059.biscani@pd.astro.it> References: <200410071402.33421.biscani@pd.astro.it> <20041008162925.3e0e03c4.lists@mjh.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6072609.ofIg2QYZL9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20041008162925.3e0e03c4.lists@mjh.name> List-Id: To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com --nextPart6072609.ofIg2QYZL9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Thanks for your response Milan. On Friday 08 October 2004 16:29, Milan Holz=E4pfel wrote: > > What are the pitfalls I'm falling in, doing this? Is this safe or is > > there stuff in -mm that is absolutely needed by reiser4? > > Well I'd make the guess that if there is something in the mm kernel > which is absolutely needed by reiser4 then the thing won't link or you > will be unable to load the module if you chose to compile it as a > module. That's my guess too. I've also noticed that apart from the changes I talked= =20 about in my previous mail, the reiser4 patches applied cleanly. However I still would like to hear from the devs about this issue. I've got= =20 my / partition on reiser4, so forgive me if I'm pretty picky about this ;-) Best regards, =2D-=20 Dr. Francesco Biscani Dipartimento di Astronomia Universit=E0 di Padova biscani@pd.astro.it --nextPart6072609.ofIg2QYZL9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBalMssknZM9JqQs0RAi3PAJ90CDJkEDrwXFATUvgQHUXJlqSjvQCfaq8L 0Rn4m5TJXQMWoZ7tzuO2BZQ= =YC8L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6072609.ofIg2QYZL9--