From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270603AbUJTXyi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:54:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270599AbUJTXsW (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:48:22 -0400 Received: from pop-a065c05.pas.sa.earthlink.net ([207.217.121.183]:44445 "EHLO pop-a065c05.pas.sa.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270499AbUJTXr7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:47:59 -0400 From: Eric Bambach Reply-To: eric@cisu.net To: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.9 and GPL Buyout Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:48:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <417550FB.8020404@drdos.com> <200410201843.49835.eric@cisu.net> In-Reply-To: <200410201843.49835.eric@cisu.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410201848.02106.eric@cisu.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry, I have been having this nasty habit of sending out unfinished e-mail lately(mis-clicks). Anyways in summary a large affirmative no from key players would solidify Linux's position as being a collaborative and open project ultimately never for sale. I think it would also show large companies who are giving support like Novell and IBM a better idea and a concrete example of what open source and collaborative development is all about. ---------------------------------------- EB > All is fine except that I can reliably "oops" it simply by trying to read > from /proc/apm (e.g. cat /proc/apm). > oops output and ksymoops-2.3.4 output is attached. > Is there anything else I can contribute? The latitude and longtitude of the bios writers current position, and a ballistic missile. --Alan Cox 2000-12-08 ----------------------------------------