From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:55:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:145.253.187.134] ([IPv6:::ffff:145.253.187.134]:22925 "EHLO mail01.baslerweb.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:55:03 +0100 Received: from mail01.baslerweb.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.domain.tld (Basler) with ESMTP id 83A4F13404F; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:54:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from comm1.baslerweb.com (unknown [172.16.13.2]) by mail01.baslerweb.com (Basler) with ESMTP id 2718713404E; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:54:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vclinux-1.basler.corp (localhost [172.16.13.253]) by comm1.baslerweb.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id 4YRPMW2T; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:54:41 +0200 From: Thomas Koeller Organization: Basler AG To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: CVS Update@-mips.org: linux Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:58:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20041020023431Z98555-1751+175@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20041020023431Z98555-1751+175@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410201858.40582.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 6128 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wednesday 20 October 2004 04:34, ralf@linux-mips.org wrote: > CVSROOT: /home/cvs > Module name: linux > Changes by: ralf@ftp.linux-mips.org 04/10/20 03:34:25 > > Modified files: > include/asm-mips: pgtable-bits.h > > Log message: > Switch RM9000 to caching mode 5. Note this requires silicon revision > 1.2 of `Titan'. Unless somebody really needs backwards compatibility > with older versions and yells really loud I won't support backward > compatibility. Are you referring to items 2.15 and 2.16 described in the RM9x2x Silicon Revision Errata 1.1? In case you are, these are still present in the errata sheet for rev. 1.2. Could you please clarify this point, otherwise I cannot decide whether I need backwards compatibility or not. thanks, Thomas -- -------------------------------------------------- Thomas Koeller, Software Development Basler Vision Technologies thomas dot koeller at baslerweb dot com http://www.baslerweb.com ==============================