From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261694AbUKIVM4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:12:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261693AbUKIVMb (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:12:31 -0500 Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.102]:28555 "EHLO pimout3-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261691AbUKIVMV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:12:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 13:12:01 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Andrew Morton Cc: Anton Blanchard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Bump MAX_HWIFS in IDE code Message-ID: <20041109211201.GA8998@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <20041109203028.GA26806@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041109125507.4bc49b3c.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041109125507.4bc49b3c.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 12:55:07PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > hrmph. That costs 50kbytes, excluding ide-tape. It's worth a > config variable, I think. this come up from time to time, and i wonder why it can't be dynamic?