From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261699AbUKIV0V (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:26:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261704AbUKIV0U (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:26:20 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:42203 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261699AbUKIV0D (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:26:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:21:29 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Chris Wedgwood Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Bump MAX_HWIFS in IDE code Message-ID: <20041109212129.GC26806@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20041109203028.GA26806@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041109125507.4bc49b3c.akpm@osdl.org> <20041109211201.GA8998@taniwha.stupidest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041109211201.GA8998@taniwha.stupidest.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > this come up from time to time, and i wonder why it can't be dynamic? Agreed, that would be the best solution. Anton