From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iAPJerIi026908 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:40:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.sws.net.au (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAPJer4B028129 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:40:54 GMT From: Russell Coker Reply-To: russell@coker.com.au To: Stephen Smalley Subject: Re: can_network patch. Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 06:40:43 +1100 Cc: Daniel J Walsh , Jim Carter , Thomas Bleher , SELinux , James Morris References: <41741A2C.8040408@redhat.com> <41A3917F.30104@redhat.com> <1101240468.19785.298.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1101240468.19785.298.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200411260640.49790.russell@coker.com.au> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Wednesday 24 November 2004 07:07, Stephen Smalley wrote: > If no one agrees with me about preserving can_network() semantics, then > I can be overruled. But I thought that Russell had voiced a similar > concern earlier. I still think that can_network() should keep it's traditional functionality. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.