From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cean8-0006bp-UU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:10:15 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cean7-0006bE-Gm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:10:13 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cean6-0006b8-US
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:10:13 -0500
Received: from [80.53.23.60] (helo=100tka.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Ceacf-0004lC-4m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:59:25 -0500
Received: from tomba by 100tka.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CeacJ-0007p9-6e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:59:03 +0100
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:59:03 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] get_func() hangs with gcc 3.4.2 on MinGW and WinXP
	host
Message-ID: <20041215145903.GA29957@100tka.net>
References: <20041215134754.GA28410@100tka.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0412151515170.16529@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0412151515170.16529@wgmdd8.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
From: tomba@100tka.net
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Witam,
Dnia Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 03:18:03PM +0100 Johannes Schindelin napisal(a):

> this is the heart of QEmu and Works Here, I think that it's got to do
> something with the compilation: either gcc 3.4.2, or some compiler flags.
> Did you try with another gcc version?

Well, I guess that's it. I didn't want to downgrade gcc earlier, but I guess
I'll have no choice as it works with 3.2.3 and 3.3.1 and only hangs on 3.4.x.
Thanks for the hint.

t.

-- 
  Tomasz Bħtor  e-mail: tomba@bartek.tu.kielce.pl  ICQ: 101194886
 ------ ---- -- - -  -    -   -  -  -   -    -  - - -- ---- ------
    "The only thing that stops God from sending another flood is
                  that the first one was useless."
                            -- Chamfort