From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (fed1rmmtao06.cox.net [68.230.241.33]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4408A2BF11 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:38:44 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:38:37 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: "Povolotsky, Alexander" Message-ID: <20041217163837.GE31110@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0A6473AF@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0A6473AF@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com> Cc: "'Demke, Torsten'" , "'linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org'" , 'Steven Blakeslee' Subject: Re: 2.6.10-rc3 for 8xx with I2C config enabled still fails ... List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:30:53AM -0500, Povolotsky, Alexander wrote: > Hi, > > Even so much "touted" ;-) 2.6.10-rc3 FAILS for 8xx with I2C config enabled > ... and our custom MPC885 based board is using a single 24C02 type I2C > EEPROM, connected to the I2C bus ... > > Does anyone of you has any input/experience about 2.6.10-rc3 functionality > (this all relates to our card) of: > SPI, HDLC, Entropia, Legerity, watchdog, NAND flash support, > MTD with JFFS2 filesystem support and flash compatibility ??? (Any info will > be much appreciated !) So, your best bet to get 8xx I2C working is to grab the 'latest' from a 2.4 tree that has it working, and move it up. In doing so, you may want to kill 'i2c-rpx' and merge it all into the i2c-algo-8xx file. [snip] > CONFIG_8xx=y CONFIG_BROKEN=y as well. Not that it's directly relevant (the 8xx breakage is in something else), but.. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/