From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Parish Subject: Re: Bitkeeper Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 00:21:17 +0000 Message-ID: <20050408002117.GD29680@us.ibm.com> References: <1112911404.7186.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4255B1B7.2030403@diku.dk> <4255C1B7.6050509@tupshin.com> <20050407235521.GC29680@us.ibm.com> <4255CE7B.8050300@diku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4255CE7B.8050300@diku.dk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jacob Gorm Hansen Cc: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Tupshin Harper , Scott Parish List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:21:15PM -0700, Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote: > From what I have heard, the main problem with darcs is that is uses > lots of memory when operating on big trees, and that it is a bit > slow due to having been written in Haskell. darcs has been fast enough for xen; linux is a completely different story :) sRp -- Scott Parish