From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DkqnK-0007cN-H2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:00:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DkqnD-0007Y2-Cn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:00:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DkqnA-0007UM-Pk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:00:24 -0400 Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DkqiW-0001vz-8L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:55:36 -0400 Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.237.180]) by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5LLqXRu003586 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:52:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:52:33 -0400 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] quick gtk2.c update Message-ID: <20050621215233.GA4594@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <677319879.20050621192059@ena.si> <001801c57699$16d32f60$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001801c57699$16d32f60$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:40:26PM -0500, jeebs@yango.us wrote: > >export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -mms-bitfields" > > Okay, I tried that. > > I then did a 'make clean'. Then the config, then the regular make > > But running the resulting qemu is still giving the same error. > > Not the slightest clue why that should be. Unless make or gcc was ignoring the CFLAGS variable (or you used different shells). You can try the Makefile.target patch I sent, that may give better results. > > Considering how big the GTK libraries are for Windows, to be honest, I'm not > so sure it's a good idea, anyway. > > The sdl library is only 300k and can be included with qemu. > > The gtk libraries are more than 6 meg and would be a little big to include > with qemu. It just doesn't seem right to have the libraries being 8 times > larger than the main program. > On Linux, the SDL library is 2.5M and the GTK library is 16.5M So I understand the feeling. However, if we can keep the Windows and Linux versions unified with GTK, I think that the benefit would be sigficant. -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.