From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263210AbVFXSQs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263213AbVFXSQs (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:48 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:25806 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263210AbVFXSQk (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:40 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: jmerkey Subject: Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:16:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Jan Beulich , Christoph Lameter , Clyde Griffin , "John W. Linville" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200506240750.03736.mason@suse.com> <42BC2CFB.2010105@utah-nac.org> In-Reply-To: <42BC2CFB.2010105@utah-nac.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506241416.31077.mason@suse.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 24 June 2005 11:55, jmerkey wrote: > >>1. No back trace > >>2. Doesn't run standalone fully embeded in the kernel > >>3. Not fully open source (since it's not embeded in the kernel) > >>4. IA64 doesn't really matter, since IA64 is basically dead anyway > >>5. No advanced recursive descent parser for conditional breakpoints > > > >This is more or less completely inaccurate. > > Which one -- more ? or less ? I think Jan answered this in detail later in the thread. -chirs