From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262827AbVF3OAd (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:00:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262828AbVF3OAc (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:00:32 -0400 Received: from [212.76.81.127] ([212.76.81.127]:27653 "EHLO raad.intranet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262827AbVF3OA2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:00:28 -0400 Message-Id: <200506301246.PAA29464@raad.intranet> From: "Al Boldi" To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?'Markus___T=F6rnqvist'?=" Cc: "'Douglas McNaught'" , "'Horst von Brand'" , "'Hubert Chan'" , "'Kyle Moffett'" , "'David Masover'" , , "'Lincoln Dale'" , "'Gregory Maxwell'" , "'Hans Reiser'" , "'Jeff Garzik'" , "'Christoph Hellwig'" , "'Andrew Morton'" , , "'ReiserFS List'" Subject: Linux and Plan-9ness Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:45:48 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcV9Wt0bSjLkkcI4Rh+0gHZkGiP+2AADx4qg In-Reply-To: <20050630100119.GO11013@nysv.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Markus Törnqvist wrote: { On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:56:36PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: >instead of trying to get a monstrosity (albeit a very cool one, >conceptually) into the kernel. Sure, it could be made to work, but not >without dropping our Unixness. And if we do, we should start by >looking at Plan 9 =) What's wrong with "dropping our Unixness" if it means taking an extra step toward Plan 9? Why is this a bad idea? } Please explain! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Al Boldi" Subject: Linux and Plan-9ness Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:45:48 +0300 Message-ID: <200506301246.PAA29464@raad.intranet> References: <20050630100119.GO11013@nysv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20050630100119.GO11013@nysv.org> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Markus___T=F6rnqvist'?= Cc: 'Douglas McNaught' , 'Horst von Brand' , 'Hubert Chan' , 'Kyle Moffett' , 'David Masover' , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, 'Lincoln Dale' , 'Gregory Maxwell' , 'Hans Reiser' , 'Jeff Garzik' , 'Christoph Hellwig' , 'Andrew Morton' , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 'ReiserFS List' Markus T=F6rnqvist wrote: { On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:56:36PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: >instead of trying to get a monstrosity (albeit a very cool one, >conceptually) into the kernel. Sure, it could be made to work, but not = >without dropping our Unixness. And if we do, we should start by=20 >looking at Plan 9 =3D) What's wrong with "dropping our Unixness" if it means taking an extra = step toward Plan 9? Why is this a bad idea? } Please explain!