From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: malcolm <malcolm@malcolm-agnew.de>
Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 09:17:46 +0200
Message-ID: <200507040917.46747.malcolm@malcolm-agnew.de>
References: <200507020148.j621m9m0006559@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <42C8B020.7040506@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-24936-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <42C8B020.7040506@namesys.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

On Monday 04 July 2005 05:42, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Horst von Brand wrote:
> >>Right.  But, /proc started somewhere, didn't it?
> >
> >Sun.
>
> No, plan 9.

Actually, I heard a lecture on implementing /proc in BSD at least 5 years 
earlier than plan 9.

>
> It seems to me that what you are all arguing about is whether it is
> better to be at the front of the herd, or in the middle, or in the
> back.  I don't think this one can be resolved, except that I would
> suggest that Linux, by virtue of the kernel configuration functionality,
> has space enough for persons of all three inclinations, if we can just
> leave each other be a bit.
>
> Hans