From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Hanquez Subject: Re: Daily Xen Builds Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:10:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20050712011045.GA4469@snarc.org> References: <1121095008.4786.0.camel@thinkpad.austin.ibm.com> <20050711220025.GA3474@snarc.org> <1121119341.6051.93.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1121119341.6051.93.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Paul Larson Cc: David F Barrera , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Vincent Hanquez List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 05:02:21PM -0500, Paul Larson wrote: > > Hm, really interesting. I've got the same report for x86 too with > > completely different kernels. > > > > so far, the only common factor left is the environment (SLES 9). > > I guess that why my tries to reproduce this bug didn't work; I'll give > > the SLES9 userspace a try ASAP. > I was seeing that on x86 too. At least on x86 (Haven't tried x86_64) it > works with the latest hg pull. you don't have anymore network crash with 2.6.12 under SLES9 ? -- Vincent Hanquez