From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kaupo Arulo Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:50:45 +0300 Message-ID: <200507122250.45949.kaups@linux.ee> References: <20050710124100.D643673691@tux.linux.ee> Reply-To: kaups@linux.ee Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <20050710124100.D643673691@tux.linux.ee> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org =C3=9Chel kenal p=C3=A4eval (p=C3=BChap=C3=A4ev, 10. juuli 2005 15:40) kirj= utas =E6=A8=8A=E4=BA=AE: > netfilter-devel: > > Our demand is like this now, a linux gateway, two network cards, one(eth= 0) > is Intranet's address 192. 168. 85. 1, the other > > (eth1) is extranet's address 202. 116. 93. 66, has tied 202 . 116. 83. > 80-93 so many real address, Intranet is 192.168. 85. > > 10-23 so many timid address, require oneself write one netfilter module, > make sure timid address and real address one-to-one > > correspondence. because in future we will use ip address pool(about 4096 > ipaddresses) to assign real ip for user dynamicly, > > so we can't use systematic nat function. I'm not sure, if I understood you correctly, but it seems that netmap patch= =20 from POM should help you. =2D-=20 Kaupo Arulo