From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262825AbVHEDUk (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 23:20:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262828AbVHEDUk (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 23:20:40 -0400 Received: from smtp113.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.92]:21602 "HELO smtp113.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262825AbVHEDUi (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 23:20:38 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: isa0060/serio0 problems -WAS- Re: Asus MB and 2.6.12 Problems Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:20:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Frank Peters , Andrew Morton , vojtech@suse.cz References: <20050624113404.198d254c.frank.peters@comcast.net> <20050804162812.29a3f2b2.akpm@osdl.org> <20050804230947.36c24139.frank.peters@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20050804230947.36c24139.frank.peters@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508042220.27480.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 04 August 2005 22:09, Frank Peters wrote: > I'll use bugzilla to report any problems with 2.6.13-rc6. > > But since I've included the "usb-handoff" option at boot time, > all my problems (except the long dhcp/eth0 connect time) are > now gone. Right now I'm using 2.6.13-rc5. > > I understand the need to pinpoint the kernel version, but the > "usb-handoff" option has even corrected some problems that > started in linux-2.4.x. For example, my PS/2 mouse now functions > normally. It has not worked with this motherboard since some time > in the 2.4.x series. Also, my keyboard lights were malfunctioning > under X-Window since early 2.6.x, but with the "usb-handoff" option > they are working normally now. > > If I had known about the "usb-handoff" option earlier, this thread > probalby would not even have come into existence. As long as "usb-handoff" > keeps working, I would consider the issue closed. > We really really need to make usb-handoff default. Even if there known boxes that don't like it the blacklist would be rather short, much shorter than a whitelist. -- Dmitry