From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030330AbVLMWvV (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:51:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030282AbVLMWvV (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:51:21 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:57543 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030276AbVLMWvU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:51:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:51:09 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20051213.145109.20744871.davem@davemloft.net> To: matthew@wil.cx Cc: hch@lst.de, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sanitize building of fs/compat_ioctl.c From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20051213173434.GP9286@parisc-linux.org> References: <20051213172325.GC16392@lst.de> <20051213173434.GP9286@parisc-linux.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:34:34 -0700 > The 64-bit code doesn't compile because Andi keeps blocking the > is_compat_task() stuff. The one place where I ever thought that was necessary, the USB async userspace I/O operation stuff, was solved much more cleanly with ->compat_ioctl() file_operations handlers. What do you really still need it for at this point? I also would like to avoid it if possible.