From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030288AbVLMWZs (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:25:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030284AbVLMWZs (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:25:48 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:19363 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030272AbVLMWZr (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:25:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:25:43 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu, dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, hch@infradead.org, arjan@infradead.org, matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation Message-ID: <20051213222543.GY23384@wotan.suse.de> References: <20051212161944.3185a3f9.akpm@osdl.org> <20051213075441.GB6765@elte.hu> <20051213075835.GZ15804@wotan.suse.de> <20051213004257.0f87d814.akpm@osdl.org> <20051213084926.GN23384@wotan.suse.de> <20051213010126.0832356d.akpm@osdl.org> <20051213090517.GQ23384@wotan.suse.de> <20051213221810.GU23349@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051213221810.GU23349@stusta.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > 3.2+ would be better than 3.1+ > > Remember that 3.2 would have been named 3.1.2 if there wasn't the C++ > ABI change, and I don't remember any big Linux distribution actually > using gcc 3.1 as default compiler. Yes, but the kernel doesn't use C++ and afaik other than that there were only a few minor bugfixes between 3.1 and 3.2. So it doesn't make any difference for this special case. -Andi