From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751355AbWDQWUx (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:20:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751352AbWDQWUx (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:20:53 -0400 Received: from over.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.150]:28066 "EHLO over.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751349AbWDQWUv (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:20:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:47:59 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: James Morris Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Stephen Smalley , casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fireflier-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, David Safford Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks Message-ID: <20060417194759.GD18990@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <20060417180231.71328.qmail@web36606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1145297742.8542.206.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20060417192634.GB18990@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting James Morris (jmorris@namei.org): > On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Hopefully a new version of evm+slim+ima will be ready for distribution > > soon. > > Why are you still trying to introduce yet another access control model > into the kernel, when SELinux is already there? Well actually I'm really not much involved. > Last I recall on this issue, we asked if you could look at providing > integrity measurement as a distinct API, and integrity control as either > integrated with SELinux or a distinct component which SELinux could use. And those are what I believe the next patchset will provide. -serge