From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750811AbWGQOwB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:52:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750815AbWGQOwB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:52:01 -0400 Received: from lilly.ping.de ([83.97.42.2]:44817 "HELO lilly.ping.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750811AbWGQOwB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:52:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:48:31 +0200 From: Jochen Heuer To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , nathans@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! Message-ID: <20060717144831.GA28284@planetzork.ping.de> References: <20060717125216.GA15481@planetzork.ping.de> <1153146608.1218.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1153146608.1218.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:30:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Jochen, you didn't say whether or not the 2.6.18-rc2 locked up. I'm > assuming it did. But did it? Hi Steven, no, it did not lock up yet but I did not do any "serious" webbrowsing with 2.6.18-rc2 so far. Best regards, Jochen