From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1161009AbWGZWQD@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1161009AbWGZWQD (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:16:03 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161013AbWGZWQD
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:16:03 -0400
Received: from host36-195-149-62.serverdedicati.aruba.it ([62.149.195.36]:25490
	"EHLO mx.cpushare.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1161009AbWGZWQB (ORCPT <rfc822;Linux-Kernel@Vger.Kernel.ORG>);
	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:16:01 -0400
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:17:00 +0200
From: andrea@cpushare.com
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>,
       Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>, Rene Rebe <rene@exactcode.de>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
Message-ID: <20060726221700.GV32243@opteron.random>
References: <20060726132957.GH32243@opteron.random> <20060726134326.GD23701@stusta.de> <20060726142854.GM32243@opteron.random> <20060726145019.GF23701@stusta.de> <20060726160604.GO32243@opteron.random> <20060726170236.GD31172@fieldses.org> <20060726172029.GS32243@opteron.random> <20060726205022.GI23701@stusta.de> <20060726211741.GU32243@opteron.random> <20060726213757.GI31172@fieldses.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060726213757.GI31172@fieldses.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:37:57PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> This is where we disagree.  It may be wrong, but it's certainly not
> nearly *as* wrong....

;)

My point of view in saying you can't dismiss the current KLive stats
completely, is simply that I didn't expect reiser4 numbers to be so
high even in the small sample of the brave KLive project that is full
of people willing to test new stuff (also note that I compared it to
isofs, I didn't attempt a comparison with ext3 myself). That makes it
a positive in my view.

If you think KLive numbers aren't a positive point for reiser4, then
it can only mean you expected them to be even higher than they were...