From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:47:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20061114194707.GH7201@pasky.or.cz> References: <87k61yt1x2.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <455A1137.8030301@shadowen.org> <87hcx1u934.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Whitcroft , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87hcx1u934.wl%cworth@cworth.org> X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gk4FW-0006em-Cu for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:47:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754811AbWKNTrK (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:47:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754830AbWKNTrJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:47:09 -0500 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:64169 "EHLO machine.or.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754811AbWKNTrI (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:47:08 -0500 Received: (qmail 13830 invoked by uid 2001); 14 Nov 2006 20:47:07 +0100 To: Carl Worth Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:22:39PM CET, Carl Worth wrote: > For reference, the latest potential batch of new users that I'm > dealing with is the set of Fedora package maintainers who are looking > at replacing CVS for their tree of package-building scripts. They are > currently evaluating systems and liking the interface of hg. Here's > the top of the current thread: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-November/msg00030.html > > Here's the report about "git commit -a" confusion that led to my patch > above: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-November/msg00141.html > > And here's my reply where I suggest that git UI might still be > improved in these areas: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-November/msg00149.html Hmm, did they (not) consider Cogito? They wouldn't have those issues. ;-) -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i