From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: multi-project repos (was Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:52:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20061117015238.GD7201@pasky.or.cz> References: <455C94FA.3050903@xs4all.nl> <455CA2A8.5010700@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 01:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Linus Torvalds , Han-Wen Nienhuys , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GksuJ-0005wm-Bh for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:52:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1424902AbWKQBwk (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:52:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1424906AbWKQBwk (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:52:40 -0500 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:32902 "EHLO machine.or.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1424902AbWKQBwk (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:52:40 -0500 Received: (qmail 8811 invoked by uid 2001); 17 Nov 2006 02:52:38 +0100 To: Johannes Schindelin Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 02:22:35AM CET, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > For example, if you used one of the old-fashioned commit walkers, maybe we > > got the initial commit, but we may not have gotten the whole _chain_. See? > > Huh? I am quite certain that FETCH_HEAD is not updated in that case. If it > is, that's a bug. It may be updated and then things may break _afterwards_. git-prune will happily blow anything referenced by FETCH_HEAD, it's not considered by the fsck-objects reachability analysis. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i